Subject	It isn't for the sake of your personal safety.
Posted by	Joe(NoVA) on April 19, 2006 at 3:52 PM
	This message has been viewed 183 times.
In Reply To	Which is just stupid posted by TT XTZ on April 19, 2006 at 03:14 PM
Message	It is for the sake of other drivers. And the law wasn't written for Z32s. There are some kits out there for the Z32 which aren't terribly blinding to oncoming traffic. It is a blanket law written because of the disastrous results that often occur from using kits in halogen housings: The first is a 9006 D2S rebased plug and play kit on a Z32 (not bernie's kit, which from what I've seen has somewhat less glare than this): versus: I know i wouldn't want the first few pictures driving at me. ********************************************************* Joe Sport 530bb/Inconel AIM: hoyatiger81 510rwhp/520rwtq at 23 psi "You probably never even got you hands dirty working on a car. Take care toolbox!" --djtz1
Follow Ups	Road Legal HIDs for Z's? - yobobrox 14:55:27 04/19/06 do you live in cali? (n/m) - CollegeBoy 14:57:16 04/19/06 yeah, i shoulda mentioned i'm in South Carolina (n/m) - yobobrox 14:59:21 04/19/06 Update your profile for future reference. (n/m) - 92fairladyz (Yokosuka, Japan) 15:14:37 04/19/06 No such thing for the Z - Joe(NoVA) 15:01:23 04/19/06 that's what i was afraid of; anyone been fined? (n/m) - yobobrox 15:03:52 04/19/06 Which is just stupid - TT XTZ 15:14:01 04/19/06 It isn't for the sake of your personal safety. - Joe(NoVA) 15:52:16 04/19/06 Wow, the first four are terrible kits... (n/m) - 91Z32TT 15:58:45 04/19/06 The last one isn't a kit, it is a pic of hid projectors (n/m) - Joe(NoVA) 16:31:07 04/19/06 are those first 4 in z32's? (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 16:34:36 04/19/06 No, Adam... - Joe(NoVA) 16:40:40 04/19/06 just asking for a simple clarification - untuck your panties (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 00:06:55 04/20/06 I realize that; I've done my share of - TT XTZ 19:53:45 04/19/06 I totally agree - Joe(NoVA) 20:40:41 04/19/06 Idiots will be idiots... - Z U N L 20:48:14 04/19/06 Brava! I could not agree more. (n/m) - 300zxquire 23:44:36 04/19/06 good thing nobody cares (n/m) - aliaZ 15:25:42 04/19/06 Obviously at least one person does. - Joe(NoVA) 16:54:07 04/19/06 I was referring to the law (n/m) - aliaZ 20:43:33 04/19/06 lol - Kenny 15:56:41 04/19/06 What's your point? He asked the question... - Joe(NoVA) 16:35:27 04/19/06 Well, my point is obvious. - Kenny 16:42:50 04/19/06 As is mine... - Joe(NoVA) 16:51:44 04/19/06 I liked your first reply better. (n/m) - Kenny 17:22:49 04/19/06 Yeah, me too. Then i realized i had a point to make :-) (n/m) - Joe(NoVA) 17:34:24 04/19/06 i already made this point once. :) (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 16:35:44 04/19/06 Yes, and it was a moot point to make that time too - Joe(NoVA) 16:43:36 04/19/06 ur so cute. - Adam (NoVA) 00:04:46 04/20/06 People care when I post it. (n/m) - Kenny 16:43:47 04/19/06 it's true. kenny4prez 2008. (n/m) - Z U N L 20:26:53 04/19/06 IllegalZ - OX-300ZX 16:58:58 04/19/06 mods under the hood are not blinding the cop to lure him (n/m) - JustinGB 17:49:51 04/19/06 exactly... the lighting/tint will be more obvious.. - DZYR(NoVa) 19:53:26 04/19/06 i've never had an issue with the HIDs. (n/m) - Adam (NoVA) 15:07:23 04/19/06 Me neither with the real deal. (n/m) - 300zxquire 23:37:54 04/19/06 don't exist. Only way would be to have them DOT approved (n/m) - olyar15 15:13:55 04/19/06 will DOT approve single things like that for a car? pricey? (n/m) - yobobrox 15:26:47 04/19/06 It is the manufacturer's responsibility - Joe(NoVA) 15:42:15 04/19/06 No. thats not how they opperate. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 15:45:39 04/19/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.